Re:YC's request for startups: Government 2.0
by umanwizard on Thursday May 23, 2019 @06:31PM
(#19996671)
Okay fine, let me rephrase. It is not something meant to be reduced.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Thanks for the rephrasing.
I should rephrase as well. The language I am proposing offers much stronger control over ambiguity.
Take the 8th amendment: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
What is an "excessive fine" mean? In the language I am proposing it could be defined as is, or in something like:
... cellType dollarAmount number cellType fine dollarAmount cellType adjustedGrossIncome dollarAmount cellType universalExcessiveFineThreshold description As a percentage of adjustedGrossIncome constant .1 nodeType isExcessiveFine cells adjustedGrossIncome fine trueIf fine / adjustedGrossIncome > universalExcessiveFineThreshold ...
So you have more control over ambiguity.
Re:YC's request for startups: Government 2.0
by umanwizard on Friday May 24, 2019 @12:37AM
(#19998519)
But that’s not ambiguity at all — “giving judges leeway according to parameters defined in advance by legislators” is not the same thing as “statutes being ambiguous”.