Well we can argue about the hundreds of Apache projects that are not even stable after decades.
OpenSource projects have another pace compared to commercial solutions
Where does Terraform claim to follow semver?
Re:Terraform 0.12
by rurounijones on Friday May 24, 2019 @12:06AM
(#19998394)
I never said it did. I said rubygems did and often fail at following that.
However I know of no common versioning scheme where 0.y.z is considered production ready.
Where doesn't it claim it? Using a versioning scheme like x.y.z _by default_ means semver
Re:Terraform 0.12
by NikolaeVarius on Thursday May 23, 2019 @03:34PM
(#19995151)
No it doesn't. Why would you think it does?
I mean, it has been around for like 5+ years...
I am even more astounded that people are happy to use a product that by its own definition is not stable.
Same happen in ruby a lot. You find a Gem that claims to follow semantic versioning and it is still in 0.y.z after years of being used in production which flies in the face of https://semver.org/#how-do-i-know-when-to-release-100