News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on PEP 594 – Removing dead batteries from Python's standard library. Parent comment

Re:PEP 594 – Removing dead batteries from Python's standard ... by enedil on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @07:35PM (#19986757)
I'm not the OP, but I suspect that what was means was backporting features to py2.7, which presumably use some new Python 3 which haven't been built in the old language version.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PEP 594 – Removing dead batteries from Python's standard ... by simcop2387 on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @10:10PM (#19987678)
I don't think that back porting features to 2.7 it's in anyone's radar anymore given that it goes end of life in just over 7 months. Anything that isn't already there is likely not going to benefit many people
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PEP 594 – Removing dead batteries from Python's standard ... by Dylan16807 on Thursday May 23, 2019 @01:45AM (#19988836)
Lots of people are on python 2, and if they didn't already migrate then an EOL notice isn't going to be a big motivator.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PEP 594 – Removing dead batteries from Python's standard ... by dual_basis on Thursday May 23, 2019 @07:26AM (#19990655)
You'd be surprised I think. In my job, EOL noticed are all it takes, often, to push people onto the next version, even reluctantly. I imagine many situations where Python 2 is still used are not developer driven but, rather, business value propositions. Many of my clients wouldn't understand a discussion about upgrading because of Unicode strings, but if I were to mention to my clients that Python 2 is no longer receiving bugfixes and officially has reached EOL status you can bet they would all throw money at it.
[ Parent | on HN ]