ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei

Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei by patentatt on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @08:58AM (#19980640)

As an IP lawyer who has been involved in several cases involving Chinese appropriation of trade secrets and/or patents ... it’s real. Smart companies don’t even try any more, just accept that if they do any business with any Chinese nationals, their secrets will be exfiltrated. And if you patent something, it will be used in China and there’s nothing you can do about it. It’s just an accepted cost of doing business these days because IP enforcement in China is still nonexistent. The courts are so corrupt and openly biased against any outsiders. The rule of law is not valued, plain and simple.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei by simion314 on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @09:35AM (#19980987)

Can you give a good example similar to what you experienced? The issue is that we read daily about ridiculous patents.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei by shuckles on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @10:49AM (#19981773)

I have noticed that the “reader mode” feature in UC Browser, the most popular browser in China, directly lifted the JavaScript from a similar feature in an American company’s product. Internal bug references, and all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei by simion314 on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @11:13AM (#19982063)

Interesting, the reader mode has many open source implementations. But I am sure you can find similar cases in ot6her countries, I was wondering some important case/example like China stealing Windows code and making their own not some small company there pirated some software, that happens in other places too.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei by shuckles on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @12:06PM (#19982632)

UC Browser is developed by Alibaba, one of China’s biggest companies. It’s easy to spot instances of stolen JavaScript because it’s injected into the page. Who knows what else they’ve stolen. This is not an open source implementation we’re talking about.

There are rumors that much of Huawei’s network stack was stolen from Cisco and Juniper through government-mandated partnerships.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei by AsyncAwait on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @04:07PM (#19984931)

> There are rumors that much of Huawei’s network stack was stolen from Cisco and Juniper

These rumors may make the U.S. feel good, but the reality is that Huawei has 5G tech that Cisco/Juniper do not. In fact, the U.S. does not even have 5G tech at the level the EU does, so maybe you just simply got out R&D'd?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei by shuckles on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @05:02PM (#19985457)

I was talking about backbone routing hardware. Wireless technology is a non-sequitur, and I’m not an expert so cannot comment. Ultimately, the parent was asking for example of “large” examples of IP theft, and this should surely count.

I can attempt to respond to some of your 5G comments. My outsider perspective is that many countries have the resources to develop this technology, and my guess is differences in timing are dominated by capital efficiency questions and not talent. Differences in cost probably come down to policy and subsidy regimes — and free appropriation of IP is only one of many kinds of subsidies a government can provide domestic firms.

[ Parent | on HN ]