Re:Stuxnet Worm Still Out of Control at Iran's Nuclear Sites
by akamaka on Saturday December 11, 2010 @07:13PM
(#1995978)
Although the headline is conjecture, the article mostly quotes experts in the field, so I would hardly say that it has zero substance. The main point is that highly technical websites and mailing lists that deal with the hardware and software involved have seen an influx of Iranian visitors, which might imply that there is an ongoing effort to contain the damage.
Not rock-solid proof, but interesting stuff.
Re:Stuxnet Worm Still Out of Control at Iran's Nuclear Sites
by lwhi on Saturday December 11, 2010 @08:47PM
(#1996163)
More Iranian users could just mean that the nuclear industry in Iran is becoming larger.
Re:Stuxnet Worm Still Out of Control at Iran's Nuclear Sites
by stygianguest on Saturday December 11, 2010 @05:03PM
(#1995760)
Indeed, all conjecture, zero substance. Once more: don't expect serious journalism from Fox News. Nevertheless, I can quite easily believe Teheran lacks the technical knowhow to defend themselves. And given the large number of involved parties (we were talking Siemens hardware), a clean room approach won't work either.
Re:Stuxnet Worm Still Out of Control at Iran's Nuclear Sites
by knowaveragejoe on Sunday December 12, 2010 @12:28AM
(#1996535)
I had the same assumption about their capabilities, but then I read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran#Science_and_technology
Re:Stuxnet Worm Still Out of Control at Iran's Nuclear Sites
by lwhi on Saturday December 11, 2010 @05:27PM
(#1995795)
+1 for highlighting lack of journalistic integrity at Fox News.
-1 for making a statement, that could quite happily be broadcast by Fox News ;)
Re:Stuxnet Worm Still Out of Control at Iran's Nuclear Sites
by lwhi on Saturday December 11, 2010 @08:02PM
(#1996080)
i.e. speculative conjecture, and a generalisation based on cultural assumptions: I can quite easily believe Teheran lacks the technical knowhow to defend themselves.
(plus Teheran is a city and a region, not a nation state - it would have made more sense to talk about Iran)
EDIT; I surrender, I saw the Fox logo, it's now very clear -> 'fair and balanced' ;)
Re:Stuxnet Worm Still Out of Control at Iran's Nuclear Sites
by jhamburger on Sunday December 12, 2010 @12:15AM
(#1996507)
Using the name of a capital city as shorthand for a central government is very common and accepted
Re:Stuxnet Worm Still Out of Control at Iran's Nuclear Sites
by lwhi on Sunday December 12, 2010 @07:41AM
(#1996986)
Sorry, I didn't realise. Previously, I'd only heard this kind of reference made in 1950s war films.
Perhaps I'm wrong, I but I think it's foolish to dismiss a country's capabilities without firm evidence. Much of the news media picks up on vague themes, and often makes assumptions based on its own country's perceived superiority. In my opinion, there's no good reason to duplicate their error.
There's some activity from that general area, so the nuclear site must be still infected? What kind of logic is that?