News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by rayiner on Thursday May 16, 2019 @09:37PM (#19935354)
The whole point is to devalue those efforts. I thought OP wanted “equality of opportunity.” You can’t have equality of opportunity if some kids get a head start because of their parents.
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by darawk on Thursday May 16, 2019 @09:42PM (#19935379)
In a world where the efforts of parents don't help their kids, parents won't make efforts. This will degrade the educational attainment of all kids. Most people consider this to be a bad thing.
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by harryh on Thursday May 16, 2019 @09:47PM (#19935411)
"diminishing the effect outsized parental involvement can have on college admissions" != "efforts of parents don't help their kids"
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by darawk on Thursday May 16, 2019 @10:10PM (#19935575)
That really depends on how much diminishing you do. Either way, at the margin, you decrease the return to parental investment. At the margin, parents will invest less.
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by bloaf on Thursday May 16, 2019 @11:57PM (#19936125)
I don't think you can ever eliminate that, short of removing kids from their parents Plato's Republic style.

Adding more rules will just create perverse incentives (e.g. parents incentivized to increase crime rate in their neighborhoods to boost their children's scores.)

Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by rayiner on Friday May 17, 2019 @12:55AM (#19936428)
I agree that you can’t equality of opportunity without the government taking over the task of raising children. But that undermines OP’s premise. If “equality of opportunity” is not an option, then “equality of outcome” should be on the table.
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by gwright on Thursday May 16, 2019 @11:56PM (#19936118)
I really don't like where you are going with this. It is too close to an anti-intellectualism theory for my comfort.