Re:U.S. cancels $929M in California high speed rail funds af...
by asdff on Thursday May 16, 2019 @05:07PM
(#19933232)
You think a small town in China could possibly ever say no to Beijing? Would a tiny community in an American city in the 40s or 50s be able to stand up to an interstate highway project? Absolutely not, but these small towns along the rail route have been screwing over this project for years to score cheap votes from an ignorant electorate. That's the political climate we live in now, same reason why SB50 has been tabled until 2020, NIMBYs (who unfortunately vote very reliably) plugging their ears and ignoring solutions to the inevitable. It has to work eventually, airports are a huge source of pollution and resulting health problems.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. cancels $929M in California high speed rail funds af...
by noobermin on Friday May 17, 2019 @01:43AM
(#19936638)
At the end of the day, and this is a tough pill for many progressive types to swallow, the enemy to changes that would benefit most of us isn't just the so called 1% (or 0.1%, etc), it is the upper middle class.
This[0] piece is relevant.
[0] https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/the-bir...