News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Boeing Resisted Pilots’ Calls for Aggressive Steps on 737... by chrisseaton on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @09:31PM (#19915577)
> Boeing discounted the 737 MAX by more than 70% to force Bombardier to sell the C-Series below cost, which forced Bombardier to sell a controlling share to Airbus for $0.

Why would Boeing want to help their competitor, Airbus, like that?

Re:Boeing Resisted Pilots’ Calls for Aggressive Steps on 737... by addicted on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @09:38PM (#19915614)
Boeing did all they could to get the US govt to prevent that sale from happening.

If I remember correctly, when the sale was completed, it was a common opinion that Boeing’s tactics had completely backfired.

Re:Boeing Resisted Pilots’ Calls for Aggressive Steps on 737... by CaptainZapp on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @04:06AM (#19917296)
Let's just say it was a classic case of foot shot by Boeing.

They absolutely wanted to kill Bombardier, but due to the fact that Airbus stepped in, took over a majority of the project and assembles the plane in the US Boeing's calculation badly backfired.

Re:Boeing Resisted Pilots’ Calls for Aggressive Steps on 737... by throw20102010 on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @09:37PM (#19915613)
Because the only thing Boeing fears more than one viable competitor is more than one viable competitors.
Re:Boeing Resisted Pilots’ Calls for Aggressive Steps on 737... by Stevvo on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @03:59AM (#19917268)
The alternative is developing a new aircraft type to beat the competition, which Boeing will avoid if it can due to this massive risk and cost involved; they only have to look at the fate of bombardier for a cautionary tale.