Re:ZombieLoad: Cross Privilege-Boundary Data Leakage on Inte...
by amluto on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @07:05PM
(#19914704)
I’m not a CPU architect, but it seems like Intel saved a couple gates by putting garbage instead of zeroes in the pipeline.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ZombieLoad: Cross Privilege-Boundary Data Leakage on Inte...
by amluto on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @07:49PM
(#19924900)
After reading more of the (limited, publicly known) details, it looks like the data leaked isn’t, strictly speaking, total garbage. But I do wonder whether Intel got a meaningful latency improvement by putting potentially wrong data into the pipeline instead of using zeroes or stalling. Zeroes or a stall would require knowing that the data is invalid before continuing with execution, which could be a performance issue.
Re:ZombieLoad: Cross Privilege-Boundary Data Leakage on Inte...
by ct520 on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @01:12AM
(#19916597)
Your not, but the gentlemen your replying to is. Bet you can’t guess where and what he worked on?
Re:ZombieLoad: Cross Privilege-Boundary Data Leakage on Inte...
by dang on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @03:12AM
(#19917072)
Not sure how to read this, but if you meant it as a personal attack that's totally not ok here.
Re:ZombieLoad: Cross Privilege-Boundary Data Leakage on Inte...
by ct520 on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @02:05AM
(#19978232)
Not sure how to read this either, but as a moderator if you strive to warn people on ambiguity you can’t discern I can assure you no harm intended per the rules cited
Re:ZombieLoad: Cross Privilege-Boundary Data Leakage on Inte...
by cfallin on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @01:34AM
(#19916690)
Yup, I worked for a bit at Intel, but I don't speak for them, I wasn't involved in any of the designs under discussion, and everything I'm saying here is public knowledge in the computer architecture community. I figured that the perspective from the academic comparch world might be interesting.