Re:Supreme Court rules antitrust lawsuit against Apple can p...
by rayiner on Monday May 13, 2019 @10:40PM
(#19906336)
Would be psyched to live in a world where Bush II got to appoint the entire Supreme Court after 9/11.
[dead]
Re:Supreme Court rules antitrust lawsuit against Apple can p...
by harryh on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @09:58AM
(#19909476)
Citizen's United was decided on Jan 21, 2010. At this point the court would have still been dominated by Bush II appointees not Obama ones. Always hard to say for sure, but it probably goes the same way under this proposal.
Most presidents are reelected to two terms, and so if judicial terms were offset from Presidential terms by a year, they'd have:
At 0 years, 0 justices they appointed.
At 1 year, 3 justices.
At 3 years, 6 justices.
At 5-8 years (and up until 1 year into the next term), all 9 justices.
So most President get to completely stack the court, the effects just don't last as long—the judiciary becomes another weathervane political branch of government, because the two of those was too few.
(And I don't even want to consider the consequences of all those short time justices looking to their post-Court career while sitting on the bench.)