Re:Show HN: Janetsh – A new system shell
by convolvatron on Monday May 13, 2019 @10:29AM
(#19899566)
I have a project that uses free unparsed text with evaluated sexpressions mixed in. I understand that alot of people just dont like sexpressions...but otherwise is anyone really bothered by this style of allowing arbitrary junk at the top level?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I think it’s fine, it’s like you’re saying that every expression is implicitly wrapped in a ‘()’ itself, so the syntax is redundant at the top level in a shell.
Not sure I’d appreciate it outside of a shell.
Re:Show HN: Janetsh – A new system shell
by andrewchambers on Monday May 13, 2019 @05:14PM
(#19904026)
Yeah, the shell implicitly adds () in janetsh, but it doesn't do it for you when you are writing scripts.