News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Blue Moon by godelski on Friday May 10, 2019 @02:37AM (#19875560)
They're going about it very different ways so I think from a typical bystander it is hard to see. We won't really know how accurate your statement is until we see New Glenn and if BFR ever becomes a reality. But historically BO has been right on the mark with their timelines while SpaceX (and a lot of other Musk stuff) is at least a year behind schedule.
Re:Blue Moon by Tepix on Friday May 10, 2019 @07:01AM (#19876672)
By 2008, a publicized timetable for New Shepard indicated that Blue Origin intended to fly unmanned in 2011, and manned in 2012. How is that "right on the mark"?

Blue origin is 19 years old and hasn't achieved orbit.

Re:Blue Moon by nickik on Friday May 10, 2019 @05:40AM (#19876348)
Wrong. SpaceX is objectively faster. The New Glenn is about the size of the Falcon Heavy in terms of payload.

The BFR is a whole different class that is gone be more in line with the hidden BO project the New Armstrong, but we don't really know what that is gone be.

That said, SpaceX is ahead in rockets but this moon lander is something SpaceX doesn't have or is even working on.