News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by ultrarunner on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @09:53PM (#19864684)
Brand new luxury housing stays brand new forever?
Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by jbay808 on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @09:58PM (#19864704)
It becomes affordable after an extended period of its price decreasing, or appreciating slower than inflation... Which we're all waiting to see!
Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by bobthepanda on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @10:11PM (#19864773)
Well, how long is tomorrow?

Housing that becomes affordable by the time I am dead is not really "affordable" housing for me.

Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by closeparen on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @10:50PM (#19864955)
A market with more homes per housing seeker is more likely to contain one for you.

As long as that ratio is less than one, some people are excluded. Price is what that looks like in a market. Under central planning it’s typically lotteries and waiting lists.

Supply/demand balance in the region is much more important than the characteristics of any particular unit, and that’s what pro-growth activism is targeting.

Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by Consultant32452 on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @10:24PM (#19864834)
It becomes approximately fifo. Oldest or otherwise least desirable housing becomes affordable housing as demand is met with newer more desirable housing being built. But if you're never building new housing, nothing gets pushed out the bottom to become affordable.
Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by eastWestMath on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @11:12PM (#19865049)
That would make sense if location didn’t matter and people couldn’t renovate buildings.
Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by Consultant32452 on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @11:16PM (#19865064)
That's just noise as long as construction keeps up with or outpaces demand. The problem is some cities have held back construction for decades, so it will take significant construction to get to the other side of the supply curve.

As a thought experiment, what if you doubled the supply of housing units in Manhattan? Or 10x? 20x? I have a hard time believing housing prices would remain high.

Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by BurningFrog on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @11:40PM (#19865171)
I hate to be the one to tell you, but it's not all about you.
Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by reaperducer on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @11:29PM (#19865119)
It can. There are millions of houses and condominiums across America that are worth more now than when they were built.

Housing isn't like a car. It doesn't depreciate as soon as the first person moves in.