Re:A Fertility Doctor Using His Own Sperm: Ethical and legal...
by Mirioron on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @06:47PM
(#19863668)
I don't think there's a crime called "impregnating a woman without consent". Not only that, he also had consent to impregnate her. The question is about where the sperm came from, but I think it's rather unclear that this would be any kind of legal violation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Fertility Doctor Using His Own Sperm: Ethical and legal...
by toomuchtodo on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @07:09PM
(#19863808)
How is using sperm a patient didn’t consent to not assault?
Re:A Fertility Doctor Using His Own Sperm: Ethical and legal...
by mises on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @07:26PM
(#19863935)
I agree it's wrong, but assault usual implies a physical attack (or, more specifically, the threat thereof). I'm not sure this qualifies; it may be a situation where laws need tweaking to keep up with the times. Certainly malpractice, though.
Re:A Fertility Doctor Using His Own Sperm: Ethical and legal...
by toomuchtodo on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @07:54PM
(#19864098)
The definition of sexual assault is not limited to physical battery alone.
Re:A Fertility Doctor Using His Own Sperm: Ethical and legal...
by anbop on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @08:19PM
(#19864225)
It’s a physical attack, it’s literally inserting a baby into someone under conditions that were not consented to.
Re:A Fertility Doctor Using His Own Sperm: Ethical and legal...
by thatoneuser on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @08:26PM
(#19864247)
Repeating that's it's assault doesn't just make it assault. How do you know what the conditions anyone signed were? Just gleaming an opinion from a headline?