Re:Lyft Announces Q1 Earnings
by sytelus on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @05:48AM
(#19857322)
Typical taxi company has serious overheads. They must pay for medalian/licensing. They own vehicles and bear fuel, maintainence, insurance. They drivers are paid fixed wages regardless of rides. They maintain on-call service center. Many Uber/Lyft drivers are in affect work for “extra income”. That means they may have other jobs and driving can be lower paying job on the side. It’s like high school kid can decide to be nanny for $5/hr while putting real nanny out of the job who may charge $15/hr.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lyft Announces Q1 Earnings
by ForHackernews on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @06:34AM
(#19857542)
That's because the high school kid's expenses are heavily subsidized by VC fund of mom & dad. At some point, they'll likely get sick of footing that bill. The same goes for Uber and friends.
Uber and Lyft (and AirBnB, VRBO, and Homeaway) are also subsidized in many cases by “I already own an expensive asset and carry all the fixed costs already, so I just need to make a profit over marginal costs”, which is largely the same as people who take a second or hobby job (including teenagers babysitting).
That subsidy is structural, IMO. That we see a lot of full time AirBnBs and full time Uber/Lyft drivers may mean it’s sustainable even outside of VC support. (I have no inside information, but I suspect that ride-sharing is economically profitable long-term at current end-user prices in all established markets.)
A lot of Uber drivers I know or had the chance to speak with actually leased/bought a car just for that, whereas Airbnb is a different capital investment.
Right. I typed unclearly. The fact that some Ubers are full time and carrying the full cost of a dedicated car suggests that it’s even more sustainable than just covering marginal costs with a profit margin but covering full costs with profit.