To ORM or Not to ORM

Re:To ORM or Not to ORM by merb on Tuesday May 07, 2019 @06:13PM (#19853941)

btw. even dapper writes that it only solves 95% of the problems:

> Dapper's simplicity means that many feature that ORMs ship with are stripped out. It worries about the 95% scenario, and gives you the tools you need most of the time. It doesn't attempt to solve every problem.

so basically stack overflow used a ORM for years. and i think they still use LINQ to SQL in coexistence with dapper.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:To ORM or Not to ORM by philliphaydon on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @01:43AM (#19856155)

I believe StackOverflow uses dapper for reads and EF Core for writes. Linq2Sql was used because EF was pretty horrible. But EF Core is pretty awesome.

[ Parent | on HN ]