News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A final proposal for Rust await syntax by yxhuvud on Monday May 06, 2019 @03:07PM (#19842655)
> (It would be weird if tuples were written "{1, 2, 3}", right?)

That is the case in Crystal. Doesn't feel weird - if anything it is consistent in that ()s always denote something to do with execution. Both ()s and {}s have multiple different other syntactic usages though, so it is not as if either is optimal.

Re:A final proposal for Rust await syntax by int_19h on Tuesday May 07, 2019 @04:48AM (#19847604)
Most languages that offer tuples, either use (), or just treat commas as "tuple operator" anywhere they don't have another meaning already. And this goes a long time back.

Function calls can then be treated as functions from a single tuple argument, as is idiomatic in SML.