Well, if we don't go (as in the entire development community) then the executive-level staffers have nothing to do there either.
This isn't exactly tenable for everyone, either. Some people [like me] need to fairly regularly eat red meat for the B12/Iron uptake benefits alongside supplementation.
Instead the industry should be pushed toward larger changes like this: https://e360.yale.edu/features/how-eating-seaweed-can-help-c...
I'm increasingly convinced the solution isn't quitting everything that looks like a vice (good luck with that), but instead to develop methods for reducing or removing and reversing the harm they cause.
I'm unclear where "conservatives" comes into play. I've never considered myself a political conservative, TBH.
Some believe divestment won't have significant impact on returns: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/news/the-mythical-per...
This is not tenable for executive-level staffers.
>> Reduce your meat consumption as much as you can.
This is definitely an impactful idea, specifically red meat by quite a large difference comparative to other meats.
>> If you have any investments shift them from fossil to green.
This is not really a tenable suggestion either unless you are suggesting everyone take a giant hit to yield and also mass purge a lot of their index funds that necessarily have large investments in energy companies, especially if they are large-cap.
>> Don't upgrade your phone.
No one should be doing this anyway on a regular basis. It's ridiculous for non-environmental reasons.