News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Biomarker for chronic fatigue syndrome identified by heavenlyblue on Sunday May 05, 2019 @01:11PM (#19833757)
>> This folks is how science is supposed to unfold and it all happening right in front of our eyes for everyone to see in real time. Quite astonishing.

So you imply that only scientists with money and direct personal interest in the research are supposed to work on the given topic?

Re:Biomarker for chronic fatigue syndrome identified by ipunchghosts on Sunday May 05, 2019 @01:15PM (#19833778)
Not at all. What i mean is that scientists discovered a problem and 1) pursued it regardless of what the major funding agencies thought of it 2) encouraged patients to get involved and 3) informed the public of their progress regularly allowing for open discussion and collaboration.
Re:Biomarker for chronic fatigue syndrome identified by cpach on Sunday May 05, 2019 @02:07PM (#19834073)
Amazing!
[dead]
Re:Biomarker for chronic fatigue syndrome identified by dc_gregory on Sunday May 05, 2019 @06:40PM (#19835534)
I think you've misread the OP here; jump back to this guideline as a rule of thumb, its helped me a great deal.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html:

>> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

Re:Biomarker for chronic fatigue syndrome identified by nyolfen on Sunday May 05, 2019 @02:32PM (#19834204)
you should re-read his comments
Re:Biomarker for chronic fatigue syndrome identified by pjc50 on Sunday May 05, 2019 @02:23PM (#19834153)
That was the whole of science before about 1850.