Re:Scopes – Retargetable programming language and infrastruc...
by _bxg1 on Saturday May 04, 2019 @11:28PM
(#19830943)
What distinguishes it from Rust and Swift?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Scopes – Retargetable programming language and infrastruc...
by panic on Sunday May 05, 2019 @08:21PM
(#19835940)
There are lots of differences, but a big one is its lack of a strong distinction between compile time and run time. From "Scopes for C/C++ Users" (https://scopes.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cpp_users.html):
> C/C++ requires programs to be built and linked before they can be executed. For this, a build system is typically employed.
> In contrast, Scopes’ primary execution mode is live, which means that the compiler remains on-line while the program is running, permitting to compile additional functions on demand, and to use other services provided by the Scopes runtime library.
Re:Scopes – Retargetable programming language and infrastruc...
by stevedonovan on Monday May 06, 2019 @02:53AM
(#19837337)
Very much how Lisp does it. Interpret, and then compile-on-the-fly, since you are inside the compiler.
Re:Scopes – Retargetable programming language and infrastruc...
by ahaferburg on Monday May 06, 2019 @03:47AM
(#19837536)
Note the word primary.
> However, Scopes can also build object files compatible with GCC and Clang at runtime using compile-object, which makes it both suitable for classic offline compilation and as foundation for a build system.
Re:Scopes – Retargetable programming language and infrastruc...
by seanmcdirmid on Sunday May 05, 2019 @11:31PM
(#19836633)
Is that really a good use of the word live? Sounds like this is just hot loading, not even hot reloading.