Re:Tell HN: Archive.is inaccessible via Cloudflare DNS (1.1....
by dcbadacd on Saturday May 04, 2019 @09:45PM
(#19830578)
There's a difference between changing results (or adding) and not supporting a feature that is dangerous and rarely used. Kind-of like banning handguns vs. providing unknownly modified guns.
Re:Tell HN: Archive.is inaccessible via Cloudflare DNS (1.1....
by gsich on Sunday May 05, 2019 @03:09AM
(#19831580)
They could have allowed "any" only via TCP. Instead Cloudflare told everyone "our software can't handle any, so yours shouldn't either".
Re:Tell HN: Archive.is inaccessible via Cloudflare DNS (1.1....
by wellyeah on Sunday May 05, 2019 @12:41AM
(#19831212)
Wait, but both of these are horrible ideas. Horrible analogy; theres no need to bring politics into this.
Re:Tell HN: Archive.is inaccessible via Cloudflare DNS (1.1....
by Vinnl on Sunday May 05, 2019 @03:37AM
(#19831648)
It's a fine analogy: the former is something some people think is a good idea, and others think isn't, whereas about the latter most people agree it should not be done. Which is what OP wanted to express.
Re:Tell HN: Archive.is inaccessible via Cloudflare DNS (1.1....
by ilikenwf on Sunday May 05, 2019 @12:48PM
(#19833653)
They also stopped responding to all DNS queries for some neonazi asshats because of public pressure and politics. They're definitely jerks but they still should be treated like any other customer unless they're actively breaking the law.
[0] https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8482