News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The many human errors that brought down the Boeing 737 Max by ncmncm on Thursday May 02, 2019 @05:09PM (#19812954)
The technical details seem correct. (I have seen 0.8 degrees elsewhere as the original amount of correction MCAS could apply per activation, not the 0.6 here. Doesn't matter much.)

The conclusion is most charitably described as fanciful. There are strict rules about an automated system being able to apply more "authority" than the pilot can counter, which every engineer and manager involved knew well.

There are strict rules about a single sensor failure that can make the plane unflyable, which all knew well.

This is not a case of simple negligence to check documentation. This is a case of deliberate coverup of known risk factors to dodge rules specifically intended for airframe changes of this kind.

It was the process of dodging these rules which kept the MCAS design from being reviewed competently.

Re:The many human errors that brought down the Boeing 737 Max by mannykannot on Sunday May 05, 2019 @11:18AM (#19833212)
I just saw this [1] (though it was published a week ago), supporting everything you are saying, particularly about a two-sensor version of MCAS being rejected because it might require simulator time. Information showing culpability is leaking out.

[1] https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/a-lac...