I in fact do have evidence to believe it's more correct than yours but I have no inclination to discuss it further.
Evidence. Not proof. And it's not secret. Just not something I'm inclined to share here.
> which you refuse to share, but that sounds more like a troll or a bullshitter than somebody with actual evidence. I wonder why.
Because of (1) my privacy and (2) the fact that you're attacking me like this. You're welcome to see me as a troll if you'd prefer that.
I have phone calls and e-mails to a personal g-mail account that make literally no sense to receive _unless_ Google had linked my personal and business accounts in a CRM someplace; an d then given access to personal contact info to some of their staff.
> the fact that you're attacking me like this
How is this an attack? I've done nothing to you that you didn't do to me. Except in my case I revealed the nature of my evidence whereas you revealed literally nothing. You just came up with a dumb and obviously false hypothesis and declared it true.
You're saying I called you a troll?
(This discussion is over from my end.)
A Google employee once called me on my personal cell phone when I was a few minutes late to a business meeting. I still don't see how that could've happened unless they'd linked my work (g-suite) account with my personal (gmail) account, and then allowed their employees to access personal data in a totally inappropriate fashion.
Maybe there's some other explanation, but I can't fathom what it would have been.