Re:Avast sees single software license used illegally 774,651...
by azim on Monday December 06, 2010 @04:59PM
(#1976989)
In short, copyright infringement. Wikipedia has more information on specific laws: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement_of_softw... and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Avast sees single software license used illegally 774,651...
by pbhjpbhj on Monday December 06, 2010 @06:44PM
(#1977326)
They're probably in breach of contract too, I expect there is a click-through.
In the UK they could probably be got for "hacking" (ie cracking) as they are using the computer from which they download updates without authorisation and breaching a security feature in order to do so this puts them in contravention of the Computer Misuse Act (or at least on a naive reading, mine, it does so).
Re:Avast sees single software license used illegally 774,651...
by Dylan16807 on Monday December 06, 2010 @08:52PM
(#1977686)
I'm sure many of these people are violating copyright to get a copy of the installer, but surely that can't be the main law being broken. Avoiding the specifics of Avast that I don't know, if they can get the installer from the producer, maybe because there's a trial, there can't be a copyright violation when no unauthorized copies are made, can it? So what is the exact law being broken?