Re:Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)
by cocochanel on Friday April 26, 2019 @09:57AM
(#19757507)
This PDF is hilarious. How can anyone get away with so much bullshit is beyond me.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)
by VectorLock on Friday April 26, 2019 @11:08AM
(#19758286)
I can't tell if this is real or not. It feels like the Turbo Encabulator of design.
Re:Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)
by rospaya on Sunday April 28, 2019 @06:39PM
(#19774188)
It's one step away from VX junkies.
Re:Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)
by bena on Friday April 26, 2019 @05:34PM
(#19761964)
Because no one is really reading it. It's not there to be read. It's there to exist. You can't pay 7 figures for a simple image file. No. There must be "a reason" for that logo to look like that. So you get someone to drum up a few pages of bullshit to justify paying 7 figures for it.
And the sad thing is that everyone knows it's bullshit on some level. But I'm not paying 7 figures without getting handed that bullshit, and you're not charging 7 figures without being able to create it.
Re:Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)
by RosanaAnaDana on Friday April 26, 2019 @04:01PM
(#19761274)
I would pay a million dollars for this as a piece of performance modern art.
Re:Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)
by kevin_thibedeau on Friday April 26, 2019 @01:10PM
(#19759660)
They need to justify the spend for the execs with something that looks like it took more than 100 man hours to work out.
What I'm curious about is how much these design agencies recycle their stock bullshit for different clients. Just swap in different logos. Restyle with the new palette of pretentiously named colors. Apply the new commissioned font and voila, you have a rebranding document the C levels can feel chuffed about.
[dead]
Re:Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)
by gridlockd on Friday April 26, 2019 @02:31PM
(#19760524)
I wouldn't assume that. In these echelons, people are generally aware that they're all bullshitting each other.
Re:Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)
by aerique on Friday April 26, 2019 @05:50PM
(#19762073)
I'm curious why your perfectly fine comments are being downvoted.
Re:Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)
by sarcasmOrTears on Friday April 26, 2019 @01:16PM
(#19759722)
Money laundering? Tax breaks? Not in this case but as a general rule where there is a big, weird, transfer of money