News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Propose HN: 'Countless' experiment – hiding all karmic in... by rossenberg79 on Thursday April 25, 2019 @05:59PM (#19752890)
If their comments are consistently good then they should stand on their own merit. Else you just get idol worship and groupthink.

Names are not as useful as you think.

Re:Propose HN: 'Countless' experiment – hiding all karmic in... by ansible on Thursday April 25, 2019 @07:37PM (#19753536)
> If their comments are consistently good then they should stand on their own merit. Else you just get idol worship and groupthink.

> Names are not as useful as you think.

Ummm... no.

I don't have the time and desire to completely verify everything that everyone says in every forum that I look at.

I doubt that anyone has time for that.

So I will use shortcuts, as does every other human on the planet. One of these shortcuts is reputation.

If someone has a good reputation with me, then that increases the credulity of everything they say. That doesn't mean that if one of the commentators I hold in high opinion says that "Goblins are behind the election hacking" I will just believe it.

However, if one of these highly-esteemed commentators has an opinion about Docker vs. CoreOS Rkt, I will likely take them at their word, if it isn't a critical issue. This doesn't obviate me from doing my on research on technology decisions, but can help guide my efforts.

I don't worship anyone or anything. Everyone's going to be wrong about something, but some are right more often than others, and should be given some benefit of the doubt.

Re:Propose HN: 'Countless' experiment – hiding all karmic in... by Tomte on Friday April 26, 2019 @09:43AM (#19757356)
Names are incredibly useful, because I know that tptacek does security, cpercival does cryptography and DannyBee does law.

In a thread about legal issues I'll certainly put more weight towards DannyBee's comments, even if he might have totally wrong views on, say, beekeeping.