News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Some Were Meant for C (2017) [pdf]. Parent comment

Re:Some Were Meant for C (2017) [pdf] by pjmlp on Thursday April 25, 2019 @12:16PM (#19749631)
Aka, C's community version of "you are holding it wrong".
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Some Were Meant for C (2017) [pdf] by badsectoracula on Thursday April 25, 2019 @12:57PM (#19750092)
Is there a language that doesn't allow any abuse of an API, including APIs that were not written in that language?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Some Were Meant for C (2017) [pdf] by pjmlp on Thursday April 25, 2019 @01:35PM (#19750518)
Yes, any system languages that doesn't need to depend on the existence of C.

If you are going to mention Assembly as possibility, check ClearPath where there is no Assembly, NEWP has full control over the hardware stack.

[ Parent | on HN ]