News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Modern C++ Won't Save Us. Parent comment

Re:Modern C++ Won't Save Us by pjmlp on Tuesday April 23, 2019 @02:22AM (#19726080)
On the contrary, we had plenty of safer alternatives for systems programming, derived from Algol and PL/I.

Then came an OS, with a symbolic price instead of the typical market prices of competing OSes, alongside source code tapes, and a systems programming language that was the "JavaScript" of system languages.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Modern C++ Won't Save Us by 0815test on Tuesday April 23, 2019 @05:49AM (#19726954)
The biggest factor was that the OS was written to run on minicomputers as opposed to big iron, and was written in a portable language. Thus it could seamlessly jump over to micros (as soon as these became powerful enough, of course), and even later on to embedded and "wearable" compute. You just can't do that unless you're writing in a highly flexible and highly portable language - more like the FORTRAN of systems languages than anything like JavaScript!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Modern C++ Won't Save Us by pjmlp on Tuesday April 23, 2019 @06:06AM (#19727049)
Ironically, systems written in hardware 10 years older than PDP-11, thus with less resources, were written in safer system languages, go figure.
[ Parent | on HN ]