News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Neuroscientist Larry Cahill on the ‘neurosexism’ debate. Parent comment

Re:Neuroscientist Larry Cahill on the ‘neurosexism’ debate by YeGoblynQueenne on Monday April 22, 2019 @07:06PM (#19723962)
Can I ask- why are you relaying these anecdotes? What is the point you are trying to make? Can you state it without recourse to examples?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Neuroscientist Larry Cahill on the ‘neurosexism’ debate by dijit on Tuesday April 23, 2019 @02:30AM (#19726108)
So I can’t give examples, and the words aren’t clear?

I don’t think there is anything I can say to convey the meaning I meant then. I’m sorry that I am not understandable.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Neuroscientist Larry Cahill on the ‘neurosexism’ debate by YeGoblynQueenne on Tuesday April 23, 2019 @07:45AM (#19727612)
I'm not trying to tell you what to write in your comments. What I mean is that your examples don't help me understand "how women think about things". If you could state what you mean by "how women think about things" in a few sentences then that might be more helpful. As it is now, I have no idea what your examples, are examples of.
[ Parent | on HN ]