Re:Fearing More Violence, Sri Lanka Silences Social Media
by ATsch on Sunday April 21, 2019 @04:56PM
(#19714527)
This might apply to "traditional" terrorism, that is centrally organized and coordinated. This is however not how most terrorism seems to work these days. Instead, we have something that's been called "stochastic terrorism". Messages calling for violence are spread by people, perhaps deliberately in the hope of someone acting upon them. Given a large enough reach of the message and enough people willing to commit these acts, this quickly becomes something incredibly hard to fight. I'm not sure about it's efficacy, but turning off social media is certainly not a completely invalid way to attempt to prevent more of that happening.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Fearing More Violence, Sri Lanka Silences Social Media
by identity-haver on Sunday April 21, 2019 @11:59PM
(#19716420)
If preventing "stochastic terrorism" was the reason they turned off social media, shouldn't they have done it before the bombs exploded, possibly even before any of the terrorists used it, and not afterwards?
Re:Fearing More Violence, Sri Lanka Silences Social Media
by tanseydavid on Sunday April 21, 2019 @07:21PM
(#19715183)
The multiple bombings that occurred in Sri Lanka hardly seem "stochastic".