Re:Planting 1.2T Trees Could Cancel Out a Decade of CO2 Emis...
by dang on Sunday April 21, 2019 @05:13PM
(#19714620)
Insinuations of astroturfing are not allowed here. Please read the site guidelines and don't post like this to HN.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
If anyone wants more explanation of why we have this rule, I've written plenty at https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme....
Re:Planting 1.2T Trees Could Cancel Out a Decade of CO2 Emis...
by drawnwren on Sunday April 21, 2019 @04:41PM
(#19714451)
Op provided a clear explanation of their argument. I don't think they argued that we need more CO2 just provided an interesting perspective on a different time scale. No need for ad hominem attacks.
Re:Planting 1.2T Trees Could Cancel Out a Decade of CO2 Emis...
by jarvelov on Sunday April 21, 2019 @04:53PM
(#19714510)
I think you need to read the comment you're responding to again. OP is not arguing for anything, rather pointing out that different plants evolved to more effectively handle low CO2 environments.
What's your point? We need more CO2 because... what?
Edit: I can't help but think your comment was sponsored.