Re:A Technical and Cultural Assessment of the Mueller Report...
by haasted on Saturday April 20, 2019 @01:01PM
(#19707567)
> With guesses or context you can fill those in with high probability. In an extreme case, the redaction might be a name of let's say a member of Congress
Something like this actually happened somewhere in the report. A name was at the end of a line, causing a part of it to break unto the next line. The few, black characters present on the second line lead readers to theorise that the name ends with “jr”.
Re:A Technical and Cultural Assessment of the Mueller Report...
by woozyolliew on Saturday April 20, 2019 @02:51PM
(#19708220)
Maybe Mueller figured out who killed JR?
Re:A Technical and Cultural Assessment of the Mueller Report...
by seanmcdirmid on Saturday April 20, 2019 @12:26PM
(#19707382)
Could a recurrent neural network predict what the redacted text looked like similar to how it can predict sentences from starts by training over newspapers and Wikipedia? Probably not useful like the above work, but it would be entertaining like Google Dream was.
I'm interested in whether this document was redacted in such a military-secure way, or whether black bars were simply placed over the text. I've reached out to a couple of news organizations offering my consulting help, but didn't get a nibble.
[0]: https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/the-decl...