Re:A Technical and Cultural Assessment of the Mueller Report...
by jstanley on Saturday April 20, 2019 @04:57AM
(#19705495)
With either a PDF file or an HTML file, there's no way to prove that the document is a redacted version of the original, rather than an edited-and-redacted version of the original. I also don't see what using PDF adds here.
Re:A Technical and Cultural Assessment of the Mueller Report...
by sjy on Saturday April 20, 2019 @10:54AM
(#19706813)
Anyone with the original document can eyeball individual pages and confirm that they (or black bars of the right size) appear in the redacted version. Doing that with unpaginated HTML requires you to use and understand some kind of diff tool, and if there are any significant differences (like a whole paragraph that disappeared without a trace), they can be plausibly blamed on 'technical difficulties.'
This is such a shame. The PDF wasn't even signed.
Is an HTML file with a hash provided directly by Mueller/whoever is doing the redacting too much to ask?
> There's really no model for redaction of HTML-based web content.
Is replacing censored text with a fixed number of some character not good enough?