Re:The Notre Dame fire and the future of history
by GuiA on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @12:01PM
(#19674810)
Victor Hugo did a great job at reviving interest for the cathedral with his book. If it hadn’t been for him, it is entirely possible it would have been destroyed instead of restored in the mid 1800s, and you wouldn’t care much about it :)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Notre Dame fire and the future of history
by johnchristopher on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @12:20PM
(#19674948)
On that note, around that time (during the revolutionary period, 1793), Liège (Belgium) disassembled their cathedral brick by brick https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Lambert%27s_Cathedral,_L...
A 3D rendering: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTkk2P0KabA
A picture, google image has more, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sint-Lambertuskathed...
And as you point it out we don't think much about it these days (for better or worst).
Re:The Notre Dame fire and the future of history
by baud147258 on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @12:27PM
(#19675016)
That link is broken
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/Si...
I think it's this one:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/Si...
Re:The Notre Dame fire and the future of history
by johnchristopher on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @12:44PM
(#19675172)
Thanks, I tried to be clever. The post now links to the media page instead of the picture.
Re:The Notre Dame fire and the future of history
by worldsayshi on Thursday April 18, 2019 @07:16PM
(#19695617)
There's an interesting point here somewhere about how a story being of greater cultural impact than the icon that it choose to portray. And yet most people would probably say that the icon itself, the cathedral, is of much greater cultural significance than the story. Or perhaps the two can't really be separated.