News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why software projects take longer than you think – a stat... by mgkimsal on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @07:21AM (#19672682)
Testing will happen. The choice you make is who does the testing and when it happens. Internal people testing earlier is generally preferable to external customers testing 'live', but either way, the testing will happen.
Re:Why software projects take longer than you think – a stat... by afarrell on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @07:55AM (#19672852)
“We can’t make those UX improvements to our core open-source product because then we’s have to introduce untested code. The current code is tested because users have used it and reported the bugs and we’ve fixed them.” Is a real thing a project lead said to me at a previous employer.
Re:Why software projects take longer than you think – a stat... by philk10 on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @11:08AM (#19674284)
"Or customers are better at finding the bugs than we are so just give it a quick look over and ship it" - genuine quote from CEO at a company I soon left
Re:Why software projects take longer than you think – a stat... by Bartweiss on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @02:24PM (#19676018)
Honestly, I'm surprised more companies don't formalize this. There are places that offer customers discounts or feature-request priority in return for being beta testers, which seems like a major improvement in both integrity and efficient feedback.

I suppose it's both slower and more expensive than "just ship bad code at full price and wait", but I'd still expect more companies to choose it as the intermediate option between that and comprehensive in-house testing.