Re:How an RC airplane buzzed the Statue of Liberty, with no ...
by danparsonson on Friday December 03, 2010 @02:39PM
(#1967167)
I wonder how technically difficult it would be to utilise 3G mobile phone networks for cheaper remote control?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How an RC airplane buzzed the Statue of Liberty, with no ...
by rthomas6 on Friday December 03, 2010 @02:52PM
(#1967207)
Probably not TOO hard, but the main issue there is the communication would not be reliable enough for something real time that had a low failure tolerance, like controlling a plane. If some packets got dropped and had to be re-sent, it could mean that the plane crashes if the communication was some sort of emergency time-critical maneuver.
Re:How an RC airplane buzzed the Statue of Liberty, with no ...
by rdtsc on Friday December 03, 2010 @03:46PM
(#1967375)
The plane would have to be programmable and would have to support a semi-automated flying mode. Then there won't be a need for a high-capacity realtime data stream.
But then the plane would have to have obstable avoidance, auto-pilot, and it must return back to within radio range if it flies too far.
Re:How an RC airplane buzzed the Statue of Liberty, with no ...
by aaronblohowiak on Friday December 03, 2010 @03:10PM
(#1967276)
"it could mean that the plane crashes if the communication was some sort of emergency time-critical maneuver."
You don't need a very quickly-responding plane to have a large impact on military tactics.
Re:How an RC airplane buzzed the Statue of Liberty, with no ...
by wmf on Friday December 03, 2010 @03:10PM
(#1967278)
That's where the autopilot comes in.
Re:How an RC airplane buzzed the Statue of Liberty, with no ...
by yummyfajitas on Friday December 03, 2010 @03:11PM
(#1967281)
Far more difficult than deactivating/destroying the cell network.