News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber S-1 by rongenre on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:36PM (#19639483)
It's against any competently worded lockup agreement.

"“Derivatives” is sort of a vague term, and there is a persistent folk belief that they have magic powers, that any legal or financial problem can somehow be solved by doing a derivative."

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-04-08/lyft-i...

Re:Uber S-1 by usaar333 on Friday April 12, 2019 @02:15AM (#19642425)
Lyft's common stockholder market standoff agreement doesn't bar hedging. See the s1.
Re:Uber S-1 by vecter on Friday April 12, 2019 @12:46PM (#19646510)
But employees are forbidden to hedge. Source: am one.