News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber S-1 by ahakki on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:24PM (#19639384)
Should've bought options to hedge.
Re:Uber S-1 by rongenre on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:36PM (#19639483)
It's against any competently worded lockup agreement.

"“Derivatives” is sort of a vague term, and there is a persistent folk belief that they have magic powers, that any legal or financial problem can somehow be solved by doing a derivative."

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-04-08/lyft-i...

Re:Uber S-1 by usaar333 on Friday April 12, 2019 @02:15AM (#19642425)
Lyft's common stockholder market standoff agreement doesn't bar hedging. See the s1.
Re:Uber S-1 by vecter on Friday April 12, 2019 @12:46PM (#19646510)
But employees are forbidden to hedge. Source: am one.
Re:Uber S-1 by usaar333 on Friday April 12, 2019 @02:19AM (#19642442)
It's a tough call to make. By the time options came out, puts were extremely expensive relative to calls due to shorting pressure driving up hard to borrow fees. Aside from how bearish you had to be to justify buying them, you also need a lot of capital you might not have.

Besides, any current employee is barred from trading options by the insider trading policy.

Re:Uber S-1 by tyrust on Thursday April 11, 2019 @07:06PM (#19640192)
Contractual limitations mentioned by a couple other people aside, options aren't even available until 5 days after IPO. http://www.theoptionsguide.com/criterias-to-list-stock-optio...
Re:Uber S-1 by Falcorian on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:47PM (#19639593)
They are almost certainly not allowed by their employment contract.
Re:Uber S-1 by acchow on Thursday April 11, 2019 @07:16PM (#19640279)
You cannot trade options during your lockup.