Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by seanmcdirmid on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:18PM
(#19639323)
Many westerners don’t really understand china’s district system for cities. Ordos City is very old, maybe a couple of thousand years by various names.
Kangbashi is a new remote district (New Town) of Ordos that was built over the last couple of decades and is still very much empty. It is too far away to commute to Ordos’s older more popular districts, and so people don’t want to live there. Many of the apartments have been bought out by speculators, however.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by sonnyblarney on Thursday April 11, 2019 @03:54PM
(#19638482)
Ordos is kind of the 'original' ghost city, the one that sparked Western curiosity.
There's a lot of reporting about it subsequently.
It looks like folks are indeed moving in, but maybe not at the rate that would make sense.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by seanmcdirmid on Friday April 12, 2019 @02:15PM
(#19647481)
Ordos was never a ghost city, one of its newly built far out districts, Kangbashi, was. Chinese cities are more like counties that contain multiple municipalities.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by gthtjtkt on Thursday April 11, 2019 @03:43PM
(#19638392)
Oh look, the propaganda team has arrived!
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by ehmish on Thursday April 11, 2019 @03:47PM
(#19638435)
You don't seem to be refuting the central claim, but rather accusing the person of being non-genuine, can you point out any flaws with their assertion?
https://www.cnn.com/style/article/china-ordos-ghost-town/ind... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordos_City
Apparently it is no longer a ghost town.