"Julian Assange, 47, (03.07.71) has today, Thursday 11 April, been further arrested on behalf of the United States authorities" http://news.met.police.uk/news/update-arrest-of-julian-assan...
Sounds like Assange wasn't that wrong?
Second, the US has had seven more years to build a case now, and a new Republican government.
It's not "unrelated". It shows the US wants him, as he claimed.
You write that the UK would have had to authorize a further extradition from Sweden to the US, but does that authorization depend on the same level of judicial review?
That's typical CIA character assassination 101. Pay a prostitute to sleep with the perpetrator and bring up false charges.
Do you think it's a coincidence this happened right after the leaks?!
>2. Assange fought the extraditions through several UK courts. He had multiple chances do defend himself, and lost every one. He lost a high court appeal, then when the supreme court upheld that decision he fled to Ecuador.
UK is a pseudo puppet state of the US at this point. Fun fact - the UK government paid $300 million to the US government to spy on its own citizens.
What conclusions people draw from those leaks is on them, not wikileaks.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/5c8u9l/we_are_the_wik...
> CBS Reality Check covers Pizzagate. https://www.facebook.com/BenSwannRealityCheck/videos/1330641...
> More: https://file.wikileaks.org/file/FBI-pedophile-symbols.pdf
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/821595404500430848
Also: https://our.wikileaks.org/Pizzagate https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1000795757983780865
So not really the victim of a conspiracy, he feared it and he was right to fear it.
1. He was wanted for questioning for rape and sexual misconduct in Sweden. According to police records, he had sex with a woman who demanded that he wore a condom, which he did at first. Then next morning she wakes up by him penetrating her without consent. She then asks "are you wearing anything", to which he replies "I'm wearing you". The sexual misconduct charges are dropped due to statutes of limitations, and the rape case is dormant due to low probablility of resolving it. Maybe they will open it up again.
2. Assange fought the extraditions through several UK courts. He had multiple chances do defend himself, and lost every one. He lost a high court appeal, then when the supreme court upheld that decision he fled to Ecuador.
3. He claimed that his reason to do so was to avoid extradition to the US, but Sweden wasn't allowed to extradite him without UK's permission first [0]. He could've gone to Sweden and face the charges, and avoided this whole thing. But he had to make himself look like a victim of a conspiracy instead, and his followers eats it up.
He's been in self imposed custody because he refused to accept the lawful rulings of two democracies, and Wikileaks has promoted conspiracies like Pizza gate and Qanon, they are not a poor organization to fight for freedom of speech.
[0] https://www.aklagare.se/en/nyheter--press/media/the-assange-...