News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on DNS-over-HTTPS Policy Requirements for Resolvers. Parent comment

Re:DNS-over-HTTPS Policy Requirements for Resolvers by teddyh on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @12:14PM (#19626118)
One could reasonably wonder why “normal” should be a fallback.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DNS-over-HTTPS Policy Requirements for Resolvers by afiori on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @01:14PM (#19626756)
I have two reason to like DoH: public wifi blocking sites and ISPs blocking sites. I understand that it is "wrong" from the perspective of a network stack, but for my use case that is far from being even a weak issue.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DNS-over-HTTPS Policy Requirements for Resolvers by gpm on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @01:17PM (#19626787)
Because "normal" = "insecure and not private"? "Legacy" might be a better name for it in the near future.
[ Parent | on HN ]