Re:Nations of the Amazon are seeking “shared governance” of ...
by Spivak on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @10:21AM
(#19624894)
I would assume that you woudln't be forced to buy your name if you own the trademark because within-reason nobody else would be able to buy it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nations of the Amazon are seeking “shared governance” of ...
by mises on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @10:40AM
(#19625121)
True, but let's say I start an apple reseller and want store.apple. That would be just fine on all counts; should Apple Computer have every instance of the word "Apple" reserved for them just because they're bigger? It would frankly be irresponsible for some companies not to: as consumers get used to esoteric TLDs, it could become a phishing concern.
Re:Nations of the Amazon are seeking “shared governance” of ...
by TomMarius on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @10:33AM
(#19625041)
Doesn't that apply only if the other company is a competitor to you? E.g. a shoemaker named Microsoft could get the domain if it was clear they're using the name fairly.
Re:Nations of the Amazon are seeking “shared governance” of ...
by icebraining on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @12:05PM
(#19626029)
Yeah, I could see a gTLD version of http://nissan.com/
Re:Nations of the Amazon are seeking “shared governance” of ...
by Dylan16807 on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @12:25PM
(#19626235)
The bar is very different though. A local business is unlikely to be approved, even if their name wouldn't confuse people.