News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Show HN: Xmake, a modern C/C++ build utility. Parent comment

Re:Show HN: Xmake, a modern C/C++ build utility by IshKebab on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @08:49AM (#19614037)
Bazel is very slow and heavy and only Google uses it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Xmake, a modern C/C++ build utility by emidln on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @09:28AM (#19614353)
Bazel has been significantly faster than cmake/make on the codebases I've tried it on. It has a bunch of warts, but it has been a better framework to build on than anything else I've encountered.

I'm probably biased as I write and maintain Starlark for C++ codebases on a daily basis.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Xmake, a modern C/C++ build utility by rienbdj on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @09:04AM (#19614136)
In my benchmarks Bazel was the fastest of the lot, including Meson with Ninja.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Xmake, a modern C/C++ build utility by laurentlb on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @10:24AM (#19614955)
Did you publish your benchmarks anywhere?
[ Parent | on HN ]