The red tape is very much a unilateral thing. And given the govt at least seems to employ more democrats, I'm not sure I agree with your assertion.

The thing is both parties are involved in most of the red tape in everything. In general, I'm opposed to most state sponsored charity, I'd much rather it were mostly voluntary or unilaterally applied. This includes corporate charity and I'd also like to see IP law rolled back a bit.

That's just my own POV, which really doesn't align with either D or R a lot of the time.

So the disabled should just rely on alms?

You would refuse to donate to charity in support of the disabled? Also, I said "MOST"

And the other side also likes to have that red tape so they can hire more administrators and burn through the money that was supposed to actually help people.