Re:Education Dept. rejects most applicants for student loan ...
by sjg007 on Friday April 05, 2019 @10:22PM
(#19588769)
This is quite common across all govt services and republicans like to add extra red tape to reduce the number of people using services.
Re:Education Dept. rejects most applicants for student loan ...
by tracker1 on Saturday April 06, 2019 @01:07AM
(#19589357)
The red tape is very much a unilateral thing. And given the govt at least seems to employ more democrats, I'm not sure I agree with your assertion.
Re:Education Dept. rejects most applicants for student loan ...
by tracker1 on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @01:34PM
(#19617091)
The thing is both parties are involved in most of the red tape in everything. In general, I'm opposed to most state sponsored charity, I'd much rather it were mostly voluntary or unilaterally applied. This includes corporate charity and I'd also like to see IP law rolled back a bit.
That's just my own POV, which really doesn't align with either D or R a lot of the time.
Re:Education Dept. rejects most applicants for student loan ...
by sjg007 on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @02:43PM
(#19617745)
So the disabled should just rely on alms?
Re:Education Dept. rejects most applicants for student loan ...
by tracker1 on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @04:28PM
(#19618626)
You would refuse to donate to charity in support of the disabled? Also, I said "MOST"
Imagine if the only way to get a court to hear your plea were to file the correct form of action. Depending on what you want the court to do, you might have to file a different form, and you also have to know which court to petition. As you probably know, courts following the English law tradition have simplified their forms of action (say, [0]) so that this task is much easier now than it used to be.
A common problem with this sort of program is that the bureaucratic requirements end up preventing people from successfully applying or completing paperwork which they didn't know that they needed to handle. While this might seem like a mere UX problem to you, or perhaps "a formality", I assure you that it can and does drive people mad. [1]
[0] https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_2
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtEkUmYecnk