News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: 300k lines of Java UI code running native in bro... by 93s6oz on Friday April 05, 2019 @09:49AM (#19582433)
Firefox has worse performance than Chrome overall, despite what their synthetic benchmarks might say.
Re:Show HN: 300k lines of Java UI code running native in bro... by vardump on Friday April 05, 2019 @10:20AM (#19582749)
That probably has nothing to do that everyone is now optimizing for Chrome.
Re:Show HN: 300k lines of Java UI code running native in bro... by ionised on Friday April 05, 2019 @09:52AM (#19582457)
How are you measuring 'overall'?
Re:Show HN: 300k lines of Java UI code running native in bro... by 93s6oz on Friday April 05, 2019 @09:54AM (#19582477)
I am not measuring it, that's the point. Synthetic benchmarks are useless when real life experience shows the opposite.
Re:Show HN: 300k lines of Java UI code running native in bro... by xori on Friday April 05, 2019 @10:06AM (#19582597)
As an enlightened individual as I'm sure you are, we strive to remove personal bias when possible. This includes measuring statistics. Which can take the form of synthetic benchmarks, but also real life tests, like page load times of notoriously bad news sites, or heavy cpu bound tasks like image resizing in the browser.
Re:Show HN: 300k lines of Java UI code running native in bro... by ionised on Friday April 05, 2019 @11:22AM (#19583415)
If you're not measuring it then it's pretty much subjective, no? You can't quantify what you don't measure.

I don't know how you use Firefox and Chrome (I use both in work) but they behave pretty much identically as far as I can tell, once ads and other crap have been blocked.

The only difference is Chrome is snappier on Google sites and seems to use double the memory to open the same tabs.