News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Wolfram Tech Isn’t Open Source by mythz on Wednesday April 03, 2019 @03:43AM (#19561552)
They're only central R&D because MS employ most of the paid dev resources working on it and no one would use any forks except from MS (or possibly Google, but they wouldn't ratify MS's platforms by investing resources in maintaining a fork) so there's no risk of fragmentation.

That definitely doesn't apply to all projects, you can look at the successful forks of Oracle's OSS acquired products.

If the OSS'ed code-base is valuable, you've just given a open invitation to all your competitors to create their own competing forks.

Re:Why Wolfram Tech Isn’t Open Source by noblethrasher on Wednesday April 03, 2019 @11:22AM (#19564072)
> or possibly Google, but they wouldn't ratify MS's platforms by investing resources in maintaining a fork.

While they're not maintaining a fork, it's worth noting that the head of the ECMA C# standards committee is, in fact, a prominent Google employee.

Re:Why Wolfram Tech Isn’t Open Source by oaiey on Wednesday April 03, 2019 @12:57PM (#19564984)
"prominent" ... What a modest description :)
Re:Why Wolfram Tech Isn’t Open Source by oaiey on Wednesday April 03, 2019 @01:00PM (#19565008)
Totally right. And the copyright like Oracle does/did. However, the same applies to Wolfram Research. I do not disagree to them being closed source for e.g. monetarily reason, just for this argument of language control.