Re:On-Demand Startups Are Hemorrhaging Tens of Billions a Year
by Ericson2314 on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @08:31PM
(#19559832)
I get they raise others' money, but which pension funds are being into this high risk stuff?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:On-Demand Startups Are Hemorrhaging Tens of Billions a Year
by bspn on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @11:44PM
(#19560556)
Almost all of them. They manage their portfolios like most other large fund managers albeit with a slight preference towards lower risk assets to ensure their short/medium term pension obligations are met, but they will almost always have an alternative investment bucket which VC will be a part of. They're also not interested in doing direct investments, so they'll diversify their early stage risk by investing in a couple of the more successful, established VC funds who spread the bets for them.
Re:On-Demand Startups Are Hemorrhaging Tens of Billions a Year
by maxxxxx on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @08:57PM
(#19559950)
Quite a few. Due to underfunding they are under a lot of pressure to produce higher returns so they invest into VC and private equity.
Re:On-Demand Startups Are Hemorrhaging Tens of Billions a Year
by notfromhere on Wednesday April 03, 2019 @11:23AM
(#19564090)
lots of them allocate a percentage to alternatives, and with a low-return environment, there was a push to keep doing it. However, there's also been a counter movement of pensions moving cash out of alternatives due to mediocre performance after fees are accounted for.
It's a mixed bag really, a lot of it has to do with pensions sometimes being run by untrained elected officials, or them buying whatever bs a pe or hedge fund shop is selling them.