News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On-Demand Startups Are Hemorrhaging Tens of Billions a Year by dawhizkid on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @04:38PM (#19558336)
You’re conflating profitability, growth, sustainability etc. you’re also conflating what is bad for Uber vs what is bad for drivers

It is sustainable to do that if by sustainable you mean have a profitable long term business that is cash flow positive

It would likely massively hurt share prices because you’re trading growth for profitability

Re:On-Demand Startups Are Hemorrhaging Tens of Billions a Year by tomnipotent on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @05:11PM (#19558632)
I'm not conflating anything, you're just mixing subjects. You said that gig jobs would get better or there would be more, and I countered that was not the case since a business cannot sustain that number of people if it's not profitable.
Re:On-Demand Startups Are Hemorrhaging Tens of Billions a Year by dawhizkid on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @06:49PM (#19559328)
I don’t think you understand how Uber/Lyft think about their drivers. They aren’t employees. In fact, drivers are their customers. There’s no “sustaining” drivers because they aren’t paying their drivers anything...they are just making a commission off of the driver’s own earnings. Uber and Lyft can’t and won’t “fire” drivers since, again, they aren’t employees.

The best way to think of drivers is that they are customers who are licensing Uber/Lyft software for lead generation for their own business. In a recession a seller of lead generation software (Uber/Lyft) is not going to turn customers (drivers) away. It just might not be profitable for you as a customer of lead generation software to buy it if there aren’t leads, but I don’t think anyone knows what will really happen to rideshare demand if the economy tanks. I think it will go down, but it might not go down as much as one might think.