A bank provides a loan to Andy for $100 to build a house. Andy builds the house worth $100. Once the house is paid off, the bank gets $100+interest, and Andy has a house worth some amount relative to that $100.
The $100 never disappears as a result of the loan. Whether or not the bank then chooses to destroy the money once the loan is repaid is not really a material to the discussion. Replace "bank" with "parents" and it's clear that no money is destroyed as a result of the loan.
What you're talking about is really just a side-effect of our accounting practices and/or asserting that all lending originates from the Central Bank.
It actually has nothing to do with the central bank - fractional reserve banking has a much longer history than central banking.
He says: "All money is in the books of the central bank,[..]"
In the case of lending, it's the commercial banks where the money is created and destroyed. If enough reserves exist already in the system the central bank don't need to act.
I'd say "money" in common usage is only M0 (central bank lines) and MB (notes and coin), and the others are only technical indicators used by economists. But that's debatable.
I.e. the creator creates an asset. The asset is then used as collateral for a loan. The loan is simply a notation in a ledger. Money is created when the loan is spent. Money is destroyed when the loan is paid off.